The Sounding Of The Alarm

FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer

, ,

By Frank Bergman February 13, 2025

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers. The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination…READ MORE

Share Current Article:

FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer

FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer

By Frank Bergman February 13, 2025 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers. The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess…

8 responses to “FDA Admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer”

  1. Bernard Fisher

    It was understood that the TGA did not independently test the mRNA substance but simply accepted the FDA, CDC and the manufacturers data and findings. It was further understood that none of those entities conducted the required testing.
    I smell a crook rat (mouse?) here with this man’s protest. The lady protesteth too much, methinks.
    And it’s about time the Prime Minister sat up and really take note and start to care for the hundreds of thousands killed and seriously hurt by these monstrous bio weapons euphemistically called ‘vaccines’, foisted upon the unsuspecting public to enhance the deadly effect of the released contagion all in the name Public Health.
    I Do not have a conflict of interest here expressing my comment. Can the writer of the above comment claim the same? A most interesting question that must be posed and TRUTHFULLY answered.

    1. keith johnson

      What about Pfizer own files stating in the first 3 months of the trials there were 1223 deaths and over 30 thousand adverse reactions?

      1. Hi Bernard we have been very active on this issue since the first data realise in May 2022. We made an A4 flyer and packed it with info about the Pfizer data. It was our first attempt at a flyer. We managed to hand out 97k of them https://www.wakeupeire.com/2023/09/04/pfizer-safety-data/ We would like to make an updated one, if you are interested in getting involved mail me at barry@wakeupeire.com
        Barry

  2. Some laboratories have chosen to report DNA levels using a test called fluorometry, which is known to overestimate DNA levels in the presence of mRNA. This is because the fluorescent dye used in this test binds to both DNA – which may be present in minute amounts – and mRNA, which is the main ingredient in the COVID-19 vaccines. This leads to incorrect DNA levels being reported in these tests.Methods for testing medicines are evaluated and approved by regulatory authorities, which require evidence that those methods are suitable for the intended purpose. The guideline used by the TGA and other regulators to assess the performance of test methods is ICH Q2(R2) Validation of Analytical Procedures – external site, developed by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). This provides performance criteria that a test method must meet to demonstrate that its results are reliable and accurate. Using these criteria, the fluorometry method used in the quoted tests to measure residual DNA does not meet the requirement for specificity. Specificity means the ability for the test to measure the substance of interest (in this case DNA) without measuring other similar substances (such as mRNA).The physical reference materials were not adequately defined. Issues with samplesSome of these studies use a very small sample number, for example only three vials. The studies also used samples that were well past their use by date. Some samples had already been opened and used. These samples were not suitable for testing.The provenance of the samples is also not clear. This means that significant information is not known about the vials used:where the vials were sourcedtheir location, custody, or temperature before or during testing.Regulatory testing is conducted within tightly controlled frameworks to ensure that test samples cannot be manipulated, and results can be relied upon. Processes that do not ensure traceability and certainty about the integrity and provenance of test samples impact the reliability of findings.Vaccine vials are required to be shipped via ‘cold chain’ where the temperature must be within a specified range and monitored during transportation. Vials shipped to Australia must adhere to these requirements and the TGA checks that this is done. However, the samples used in these studies were not kept in cold chain and usually did not have temperature loggers with them. Laboratory statusThe accreditation status of the laboratories is unknown. There is no evidence that these laboratories have Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certification, which is required by laboratories to perform approved testing for pharmaceutical companies. Nor do the laboratories appear to have accreditation to the international standard ISO/IEC 17025 : General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. These types of accreditations ensure that the results they produce are robust and reliable. Biotechnology medicines have been available since the 1980sDNA is an approved starting material for many biotechnology products. This includes recombinant proteins such as insulin, growth factors, cancer medicines, autoimmune therapies and other vaccines, as well as mRNA vaccines such as Comirnaty and Spikevax.Residual DNA may be present in very small quantities in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and other biotechnology products. Residual DNA is the amount of DNA remaining after processing and purification of the medicine and is present as small fragments. Products that use DNA as a starting material have strict limits on the amount of residual DNA which can be present in the final medicine.Medicines produced by biotechnology have been used by millions of patients for over 40 years. In that time, medicines containing residual DNA quantities under the required limits have presented a very low risk to human safety.The ability of the manufacturer to minimise amounts of residual DNA and reliably test for it during the manufacturing process is rigorously evaluated by the TGA and other international regulators prior to approval.The manufacturing protocol and test results must be provided to the TGA for each batch of vaccine released in Australia. Every final batch of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines released in Australia has met the regulatory requirements for residual DNA concentration. To date, the TGA has also independently tested 27 batches of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines by qPCR to confirm the residual DNA concentration in the final product. The vaccines met the required limits for residual DNA.The quality limits ensure that there is less than 10 ng present per dose – or less than ten billionths of a gram in each dose. These limits are used by the TGA, the World Health Organization, the United States Food and Drug Administration and other international regulatory agencies. Residual DNA in Biotechnology Products – safetyTo date, neither the TGA nor any international regulator has established a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and any type of cancer.There has been no evidence of mRNA vaccines or biological medicines used in Australia resulting in integration of residual DNA into human DNA genome. This includes products such as insulin, which are injected multiple times a day for life-long treatments.Furthermore, in the combined reproductive and development animal studies using 200-times the clinical dose of mRNA vaccines, there were no adverse effects on male or female fertility, fetal deaths, birth defects, or developmental delays.Evidence from the more than 13 billion vaccine doses given worldwide shows that COVID-19 vaccines have a very good safety profile in all age groups. The benefits of the approved vaccines far outweigh the possible risks.Contact for members of the media:Email: news@health.gov.auPhone: 02 6289 7400.

    1. Rob

      Sitting in the middle of a shit-storm of nasty, without any option to change that dumb decision to be sat there in the first place, the only thing left to do to do is close your eyes and pretend the shit does not fly around you. I understand that the realization of being played/fooled/manipulated is not an easy one. In this instance ignorance is not only bliss, but a necessity to not lose ones mind knowing about the injected ticking time bomb.

      I hope you fare better than the ones that have died, the ones that are suffering, and those that are yet to experience the consequences of being injected with an experimental gene altering treatment.

      1. The comment was posted by somebody who entered their username as “You’re stupid” and email “literallyjustusegoogledumbassfuckyou@gmail.com” then proceeded to copy and paste some google bot AI propaganda. I don’t think its a stretch to say that that individual has no clue what the words they posed means and could certainly not conversate about it – Its not their thoughts, they don have thoughts of their own, they support the current thing.

        Please do not let the NPC bio-bots upset you. By hook or by crook, they will learn that the world in not rainbows and lollypops, and that there is a subsection of the global population who care not about identity politics but are simply using certain groups to achieve their global goals (domination over us all for ever). By hook or by crook we will all eventually see the truth, lets hope it not to late by then. Best to get educated now, and help inform others to the best of our ability.

    2. This isnt even Europe or Ireland but ill entertain it…
      This TGA? The Therapeutic Goods Administration?
      The TGA who faced controversy over its close up and sexy relationship with the medical industry?, particularly in relation to the approval of transvaginal mesh products?
      Despite a lack of evidence for their safety and efficacy… Ringing any bells?

      Health experts criticized the TGA for accepting fees from industry, which they deemed unacceptable following the transvaginal mesh scandal, but not for C-19 clot shot thats ok.

      The TGA approved meshes for use in treating prolapse despite a lack of evidence for the safety of the products, leading to severe complications for thousands of women who received the meshes, including severe pain and damage to nerves and nearby organs. Hummmmm? Customers for life.

      In response to these criticisms, the TGA denied that it was too close to the industry or that receiving funding from health and medical companies was a conflict of interest. Fuck You! We’re keeping the money so shut up and suffer.

      Shockingly: Despite these denials, concerns about the TGA’s independence and regulatory practices continue to be raised by health experts and the public to this day.

      If you want to trust their advice with a documented bio-weapon getting shot straight into you, go for it! – Ironically you will actually make the world a better, safer and more enjoyable place for the ones left. But don’t forget Australia’s expert panel on immunisation reveals it NEVER recommended controversial Covid clot shot mandates be put in place watch the narrative change in real time. “Some People, You Just Cant Help

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *