Despite insufficient safety data and growing evidence of biological effects, 5G and other wireless technologies are being deployed unchecked, prioritizing corporate interests over public health.
The study identifies biases and logical fallacies in regulatory assessments that downplay potential risks:
Appeal to Ignorance – Concluding that because definitive harm has not been proven, 5G must be safe, rather than acknowledging that safety has not been established.
Faulty Analogy – Comparing 5G mmWave exposure to short-term exposures like airport scanners, ignoring key differences in frequency, modulation, and duration.
Red Herring – Emphasizing that mmWaves only penetrate a few millimeters into the skin while overlooking their potential systemic effects through neural and immune pathways…READ MORE
Leave a Reply